|
Where the parties stand on the CBC and other national media issues
The Guild has developed the
following analysis to help members make an informed vote for their work in the
October 14 election. We have used responses to questionnaires delivered to all
parties by the Campaign for
Democratic Media (a national coalition of academics, unions and public
interest groups) and
ACTRA, the
records of the two parties who have held power, and statements in this and
previous election campaigns.
Only the NDP commits to
increasing funding for the CBC. However, individual MPs from other
parties have spoken out in favour of strengthening the public broadcaster,
including Liberal MPs Mauril Bélanger and Scott Simms and Conservative MP Gary
Schellenberger.
All members of the three
opposition parties – the Liberals, the NDP and the Bloc Québecois – supported a
June 2006 motion in the House of Commons in favour of maintaining and enhancing
Canadian content and ownership regulations in broadcasting as well as funding
for the CBC. The Conservatives voted unanimously against the motion. (Click
here for more information.)
Last February, the
parliamentary Heritage Committee issued a report based on its review of CBC’s
mandate with recommendations supported by all parties on the committee. (Click
here for more information on the report.) That report provides the
blueprint that we urge the next government to follow in order to strengthen our
public broadcaster. A key recommendation is for Parliament to provide a major increase to CBC funding.
Party positions:
| Issue |
Conservatives* |
Liberals |
NDP |
Bloc Québécois |
Greens |
|
CBC funding |
The government
abandoned a planned review of CBC’s man-date, which was then under-taken by
the Heritage Committee. The committee’s recommendations, including the
recognition that CBC needed more funding to provide its services and the
signing of an agreement between CBC and the government for long-term
funding, were ignored by the Conservative government. In this campaign, the
Conservatives sent a fund-raising letter to partisans, asking whether $1.1
billion for the CBC is a good use of public funds. In the 2004, Conservative
leader Stephen Harper mused publicly about commercializing CBC TV and Radio
2. Since then, he has not stated a clear position on the future of the CBC.
He did say during the leaders’ debate that his government had given more
money to the CBC. He was apparently referring to a year-to-year $60 million
grant for Canadian programming initiatives, started under the previous
Liberal government. That grant was never made permanent. |
To the question of
whether they will make a permanent increase to CBC funding, the Liberals say
they are “committed to long-term and sustainable funding for the CBC.”
The single biggest budget cut ever imposed on the CBC was the work of a
previous Liberal government in the mid-1990s, when CBC lost one-third of its
parliamentary funding.
|
The NDP tells ACTRA
it commits to increased funding for the CBC and will “strengthen the ability
of CBC and Radio-Canada to deliver superior regional programming and new
internet-based media services.” |
The bloc is “in
favour of multi-year funding for the CBC.” |
The Green Party did
not answer whether it supports a permanent increase to CBC’s parliamentary
allocation. A policy paper states that Green Party MPs will “provide
stable base-funding for the CBC so it can continue to provide quality
Canadian content television and radio programming in both official languages
to all Canadians.” |
|
Local News |
Conservative Heritage
Minister Josée Verner declined to intervene after the new owner of the the
French-language, private TV network TQS – Remstar – got a licence from the
CRTC that allowed for the scaling back of local news. There was
widespread opposition to the reduction of local news in Quebec. |
In answer to the
question about changing broadcast policy to ensure that conventional TV and
talk radio stations maintain newsgathering and provide local news, the
Liberals point out that they supported a motion in the House demanding that
conventional TV station owners be required to provide local news as a
condition of their licence with the CRTC.
In
1999, however, the CRTC stopped requiring local stations to provide news.
The Liberal government in power at the time did not intervene to revise that
policy. |
The NDP opposes “the
loss of choice” in local coverage that has resulted from media mergers and
says “any further moves in the broadcast/ telecom industry for further
integration must take place with the interests of ensuring a diversity of
Canadian broadcast voices.” |
The Bloc called for
new regulations ensuring local newsgathering and programming from
conventional TV stations during the recent CRTC hearings on the sale of TQS
to Remstar. |
The Green Party did
not answer the question. |
|
Concentration of media ownership |
The Conservatives
have governed during a wave of mergers in the Canadian media industry and
has refrained from acting to protect the diversity of news and programming
available to Canadians. Instead, the government named a competition panel
that recommended increased deregulation of sectors including
telecommunications, which is entwined with broadcasting and other cultural
industries. |
When asked whether
they support establishing new rules – prohibiting common ownership of
newspapers and TV stations in the same market, limiting the repurposing of
content across platforms, separating newsrooms within companies with more
than one media property – to ensure a diversity of voices in the media, the
Liberals say their government would “examine carefully the impact media
concentration has on the diversity of voices available to the Canadian
public. This diversity must be protected.” The
Liberals governed during the previous wave of media consolidation, in the
early 2000s, and did not intervene to establish new rules to protect the
diversity of news and programming available to Canadians. |
The NDP said “we have
seen one takeover after another (in the media) and the public has been the
loser every time. The New Democrats feel Canada needs clear rules and limits
to the concentration of media in this country.” |
“The Bloc Québécois
is calling for the creation of a regulatory body in Quebec for
telecommunications and broadcasting that could, among other things,
establish policy on overall media concentration.” |
The Green Party did
not answer the question. |
* Despite being approached several times,
the Conservative Party did not respond to the questionnaires.
For more information, contact the CMG at
info@cmg.ca or by calling 416-591-5333 or
1-800-465-4149.
|