Toll-free: 1-800-465-4149       E-mail: info@cmg.ca

cmg www

  the guild at:













  resources



 


Click here to receive our email updates
 


Make CMG your home page

Click the icon above to make CMG your first stop online!

  federal election 2008


Where the parties stand on the CBC and other national media issues

 

The Guild has developed the following analysis to help members make an informed vote for their work in the October 14 election. We have used responses to questionnaires delivered to all parties by the Campaign for Democratic Media (a national coalition of academics, unions and public interest groups) and ACTRA, the records of the two parties who have held power, and statements in this and previous election campaigns.

 

Only the NDP commits to increasing funding for the CBC. However, individual MPs from other parties have spoken out in favour of strengthening the public broadcaster, including Liberal MPs Mauril Bélanger and Scott Simms and Conservative MP Gary Schellenberger.

 

All members of the three opposition parties – the Liberals, the NDP and the Bloc Québecois – supported a June 2006 motion in the House of Commons in favour of maintaining and enhancing Canadian content and ownership regulations in broadcasting as well as funding for the CBC. The Conservatives voted unanimously against the motion. (Click here for more information.)

 

Last February, the parliamentary Heritage Committee issued a report based on its review of CBC’s mandate with recommendations supported by all parties on the committee. (Click here for more information on the report.)  That report provides the blueprint that we urge the next government to follow in order to strengthen our public broadcaster. A key recommendation is for Parliament to provide a major increase to CBC funding.

 

Party positions:
 

Issue Conservatives* Liberals NDP Bloc Québécois Greens
CBC funding The government abandoned a planned review of CBC’s man-date, which was then under-taken by the Heritage Committee. The committee’s recommendations, including the recognition that CBC needed more funding to provide its services and the signing of an agreement between CBC and the government for long-term funding, were ignored by the Conservative government. In this campaign, the Conservatives sent a fund-raising letter to partisans, asking whether $1.1 billion for the CBC is a good use of public funds. In the 2004, Conservative leader Stephen Harper mused publicly about commercializing CBC TV and Radio 2. Since then, he has not stated a clear position on the future of the CBC. He did say during the leaders’ debate that his government had given more money to the CBC. He was apparently referring to a year-to-year $60 million grant for Canadian programming initiatives, started under the previous Liberal government. That grant was never made permanent.

To the question of whether they will make a permanent increase to CBC funding, the Liberals say they are “committed to long-term and sustainable funding for the CBC.” 
 The single biggest budget cut ever imposed on the CBC was the work of a previous Liberal government in the mid-1990s, when CBC lost one-third of its parliamentary funding.

 

The NDP tells ACTRA it commits to increased funding for the CBC and will “strengthen the ability of CBC and Radio-Canada to deliver superior regional programming and new internet-based media services.” The bloc is “in favour of multi-year funding for the CBC.” The Green Party did not answer whether it supports a permanent increase to CBC’s parliamentary allocation. A policy paper  states that Green Party MPs will “provide stable base-funding for the CBC so it can continue to provide quality Canadian content television and radio programming in both official languages to all Canadians.”
Local News Conservative Heritage Minister Josée Verner declined to intervene after the new owner of the the French-language, private TV network TQS – Remstar – got a licence from the CRTC that allowed for the scaling back of local news.  There was widespread opposition to the reduction of local news in Quebec.

In answer to the question about changing broadcast policy to ensure that conventional TV and talk radio stations maintain newsgathering and provide local news, the Liberals point out that they supported a motion in the House demanding that conventional TV station owners be required to provide local news as a condition of their licence with the CRTC.

 In 1999, however, the CRTC stopped requiring local stations to provide news. The Liberal government in power at the time did not intervene to revise that policy.

The NDP opposes “the loss of choice” in local coverage that has resulted from media mergers and says “any further moves in the broadcast/ telecom industry for further integration must take place with the interests of ensuring a diversity of Canadian broadcast voices.”

The Bloc called for new regulations ensuring local newsgathering and programming from conventional TV stations during the recent CRTC hearings on the sale of TQS to Remstar. The Green Party did not answer the question.
Concentration of media ownership The Conservatives have governed during a wave of mergers in the Canadian media industry and has refrained from acting to protect the diversity of news and programming available to Canadians. Instead, the government named a competition panel that recommended increased deregulation of sectors including telecommunications, which is entwined with broadcasting and other cultural industries.

When asked whether they support establishing new rules – prohibiting common ownership of newspapers and TV stations in the same market, limiting the repurposing of content across platforms, separating newsrooms within companies with more than one media property – to ensure a diversity of voices in the media, the Liberals say their government would “examine carefully the impact media concentration has on the diversity of voices available to the Canadian public. This diversity must be protected.”  The Liberals governed during the previous wave of media consolidation, in the early 2000s, and did not intervene to establish new rules to protect the diversity of news and programming available to Canadians.

The NDP said “we have seen one takeover after another (in the media) and the public has been the loser every time. The New Democrats feel Canada needs clear rules and limits to the concentration of media in this country.” “The Bloc Québécois is calling for the creation of a regulatory body in Quebec for telecommunications and broadcasting that could, among other things, establish policy on overall media concentration.” The Green Party did not answer the question.

* Despite being approached several times, the Conservative Party did not respond to the questionnaires.

For more information, contact the CMG at info@cmg.ca or by calling 416-591-5333 or 1-800-465-4149.
 

The Newspaper Guild                        Commun ications Workers of America                        Canadian Labour Congress                        International Federation of Journalists

© 2000-2010 Canadian Media Guild